Introduction
What if the structure of engineering teams could unlock a deeper understanding of the energy sector’s evolving landscape? The roles and dynamics of employees are not just HR metrics—they are powerful indicators of a company’s strategic focus.
In the world of energy transition and electrification, the makeup of engineering teams tells a compelling story. Companies tackling the complexities of power grid solutions lean on seasoned engineers with deep expertise, while those developing innovative technologies like EV chargers and hydrogen electrolyzers are cultivating a new generation of junior engineers.
But why does this difference exist? The answer lies in each technology’s distinct challenges and stages of development.
Engineers specialize in various areas within the electrical sector, each requiring distinct expertise. Some work in production and manufacturing, ensuring the smooth operation of industrial machinery. Others focus on designing and developing cutting-edge energy management and optimization systems. Research and development teams push the boundaries of innovation, while renewable sector engineers are responsible for designing, installing, and operating sustainable energy solutions.
Each of these areas demands a specific set of skills and knowledge, reflecting the diverse nature of the energy industry. This underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary engineering approach in driving the energy transition forward. Through this article, we will help you understand how different engineering staff seniorities reflect the unique demands and complexities within the energy sector.
Understanding Engineering Roles in Energy Transition
The role of a skilled and expert workforce, particularly engineers, is pivotal in determining the success of the electrification and sustainability efforts. This transition presents numerous challenges that require a diverse set of engineering skills to address effectively.
For example, electric power grid infrastructure consists of highly sophisticated technologies, requiring experienced engineers to ensure the smooth operation of the grids worldwide. Meanwhile, companies pioneering new energy solutions harness fresh talent to keep up with rapid changes, innovation, and evolving market demands.
Comparing Engineering Seniority Across Different Companies
To explain this, let us take a closer look at the engineering staff across various verticals within the energy sector. For the sake of understanding, we can categorize these companies into two groups: those focused on electrification products and those providing power grid solutions.
Group 1 – Electrification Products
Power electronics is a field that has been taught for many years, but its widespread commercial applications have only emerged in the past couple of decades. Consequently, engineers specializing in modern power electronics are well suited for designing electrification solutions.
Therefore, companies in Group 1 typically employ more fresh engineers with the knowledge and background of modern power electronics. Their focus is the development of electrification solutions, such as electric vehicle (EV) chargers and hydrogen electrolyzers.
We will analyze prominent players in the electrification sector, i.e., Alpitronic, Tritium, and Enapter.
Group 2 – Power Grid Solutions
On the other hand, companies in Group 2 design and deploy power grid solutions, having expertise in traditional and modern power systems. Engineers in this group of companies developing power grids enable smooth renewable energy integration while ensuring overall system reliability.
Therefore, companies like American Superconductor (AMSC), Smart Wires, and Line Vision are clubbed in Group 2.
Correlation Between Complexity and Seniority Levels
To illustrate further, we will present data visualizations showing the distribution of seniority levels across different companies. These valuable data insights are derived from our advanced tool, Matos AI, which seamlessly analyzes job function and seniority data to provide a comprehensive view of industry trends.
For example, Group-1 companies like Alpitronic and Tritium employ many aspiring engineers to support their rapid evolution, development, and scaling of electrification solutions.

Figure 1: Alpitronic Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos

Figure 2: Tritium Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos
Similarly, Enapter, which develops hydrogen electrolyzers using Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM) technology, has a high proportion of junior engineers. The company focuses on scaling production benefits from a workforce that can implement innovative ideas while technology evolves.

Figure 3: Enapter Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos
This reflects the evolving nature of product development in these areas, where fresh ideas and adaptability are crucial as the market for electric vehicles, EV chargers, and hydrogen solutions expands.
Companies in Group-2, like AMSC, have a higher proportion of experienced engineering staff as the development of power grid solutions requires skilled, professional engineers capable of designing robust solutions.

Figure 4: AMSC Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos
Likewise, Smart Wires develops solutions to optimize power flow and manage grid bottlenecks, enabling more efficient use of the existing grid infrastructure. According to the job’s complexity, they have an experienced workforce that helps tackle the sophisticated challenges of renewable integration.

Figure 5: Smart Wires Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos
Line Vision is another company with advanced, non-contact sensors and software that provide dynamic line ratings and transmission line monitoring capabilities for grid resilience. Insights from Matos reveal that the company has a balanced mix of junior and senior engineers. The combination of aspiring and experienced engineers at Line Vision supports the technical expertise needed for developing grid monitoring algorithms and the flexibility required to refine and scale these solutions in a growing market. This balance enables Line Vision to innovate while addressing the complexities of real-time grid monitoring.

Figure 6: Line Vision Staff Data.
Source: LinkedIn, data extracted and processed by Matos
Implications for Energy Transition
So, what are the takeaways?
- The difference in staffing reflects a critical insight: as the complexity of the challenges increases, so does the need for experienced engineers.
- The energy transition encompasses more than developing innovative technologies like EV chargers and hydrogen electrolyzers. These modern technologies, especially EV charging infrastructure, also impact the grid due to being a power-intensive technology.
- Extensive experience in power systems is crucial in companies that develop advanced technologies and strategies to ensure the smooth operation of the electric power grid.
Using Seniority Data to Drive Strategic Insights
Analyzing engineering seniority data provides critical strategic insights that can enhance decision-making within the energy sector. Matos’s insights reveal that companies specializing in power grid solutions typically have more senior engineers.
In contrast, organizations with many entry-level engineers are more agile, allowing them to innovate rapidly in emerging fields like electric vehicle chargers and hydrogen electrolyzers.
Matos helps evaluate how engineering seniority correlates with specific job functions. Once you analyze the relationship between seniority level and the job function of engineers employed by different organizations, you can better understand that the problems being solved in the energy sector are rather diverse.
Understanding the relationship between engineering roles and seniority levels empowers organizations to optimize their talent deployment.
Conclusion
Understanding how engineering seniority aligns with job specialization reveals much more than just who does the work. It uncovers why these roles are essential for tackling the unique challenges of each energy sector. From seasoned experts in power grids to early-career engineers driving innovation in renewables, this blend of skills is crucial in advancing the energy transition.
Additionally, having visibility into the expertise within engineering teams not only offers a competitive advantage but also sheds light on the technologies competitors may be focusing on, helping companies stay agile in an evolving industry landscape.
In the fast-changing world of energy, aligning your engineering workforce with the specific demands of each industry is not just a smart strategy; it is a necessity.
So, what is your next step? Are you ready to rethink your workforce strategy and lead the way in the energy transition?